Showing posts with label Nikita Wu. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Nikita Wu. Show all posts

Friday, April 22, 2011

違章建築 ILLEGAL ARCHITECTURE

Marco Casagrande
Translation by Nikita Wu

「朗讀違章」一展延續王澍、謝英俊兩位建築師的一貫信仰,將焦點轉到台灣城市的空間秩序,共同以裝置作品來闡述違章建築下的多面省思,同時試圖引發思考―在既定的體制裡,「由下而上」重新定義城市建築與權力間關係的種種可能。

原本寶藏巖違章社區現已變成「美化」後的台北國際藝術村。



首次受到委託在台北執業,是為要挽救寶藏巖社區裡的違章建築,同時我和謝英俊與阮慶岳也有了頭回聚合營造建築的機會。我們的工作分配如往後的幾次經驗,謝和我負責勞力流汗的部分,阮則負責其他不需勞動的部分。我們三人之前曾參加由季鐵男在奧地利林茨 (Linz) 主辦的「都市閃光」(Urban Flashes),阮是我和謝對談的主持人兼口譯,所以很自然地「注意到」彼此的存在。當我在寶藏巖工作的時候,與謝和居民們並沒有共通的語言,所以只好自發性蠻著頭幹苦力活,從實際流汗經驗中作工程。謝選擇自寶藏巖的山坡上開始營建,我則從山坡下蓋, 一邊溝通同時即興創作,彼此感知對方的建構行動即時反應,在某處某時聚合成作品,此間所為可謂「開放形態」(Open Form) (註) 建築的操作手法。

台北本身就是 「開放形態」的都市,市民們有機地規劃設計城市樣態,如叢林裡無章簇生的植物主宰無人之地。謝英俊說他自來叢林,能接收大自然給他的指令 。像台灣人蓋違建這建築如寄生蟲般,利用「官方」規劃的都市作為生存平台與能量來源,那兒漏了點自來水或能偷接電,就往那邊蓋。台灣文化城市景觀根生蒂固,眼見所及,游擊佔領空地的菜園,逃稅小販叢集夜市自發性的聚合,違章建築星羅棋佈官方界定都市之上, 自成另一道平行的都市紋理,化為一個瞬間既成的即時台北 (Instant Taipei)。

蘭花建築 ORCHID ARCHITECTURE

謝英俊的裝置作品「後巷桃花源」。



違章建築就是弱建築,非常精準適當懶惰,試圖用最小的氣力發揮最大的效益 。 違章極具個性和自然界的天性,消逝和花開繁榮皆可時刻並存。官辦官樣的台北僵硬枯燥無味,但由居民非法破壞、面目模糊的工業城市,推展如蘭花生衍的建築行為,則讓城市充滿生氣。

違章建築在台灣垂直和平行擴展,以各種型式蔓生於公寓住宅、非法搭建的透天厝、違建社區。比如新店溪畔的寶藏巖和阿美族落腳的溪洲部落、養鴿籠舍、檳榔攤、土地公小廟,布袋戲歌仔戲的戲班舞台、夜市的小販這些可自由移動的建築當可一併算上。

在官方界定架構的城市景觀中,相對於非法自蓋自造的違章,張顯了文化的多樣性。能屈能伸富含彈性空間,可移動可依需求調整的軟性建築,長存在於遊牧民族的傳統住房結構。現代「官方」都市則才是晚近才有的概念。人類自有通過建築這種藝術形式表達自己的本性,不須要任何建築師,人人都是建築師,但城市公民行使天賦權利時,確被貼上了非法建築的新標籤。違建靈巧創意佳,比起「官方」認可的建築師們被收買淪陷於大學教學、營建業與法規,還要富含建築策略。

官方認可的都市,意望擺脫來自人性不受控制的一切,這意味著不可以自力造「非法」建築和自種生產食物的「非法」菜園。工業化的要義在於規範人類生活,都市是座機器。違章建築和大自然最為接近也和人的本性相依,不受任何控制。

謝英俊說他要作「人民的建築」,這意味著不但要在鄉村更要在工業化的都市裡將人民蓋房子的權利還給人民,也讓人民有機會自決治理公民的社會。他要人民再次學著讓居住環境服膺自然環境,聯結各別身處的在地知識 (Local Knowledge) 經由實際的勞動,體會在地的建築景觀,擺脫僵化的官方合法限制。在工業化和現代主義發生之前,這都是正常發生的事。但如今,官方界定的都市載明的官樣資料文件上,人民的建築是人為的錯誤,有礙觀瞻街道必須進一步地「美化」。


WEAK!


2009 WEAK! 深圳香港建築雙年展作品「繭」(The Bug Dome)。


謝英俊、阮慶岳及我合作成立關係自由鬆散的建築團隊,我們起名為「弱」(WEAK!)。2009年我們在深圳為從鄉村來到都市掙錢的農民工,蓋了一座非正式不官方的社交俱「繭」(The Bug Dome) 展間主要是由兩位心思敏感來自廣西壯族,熟習竹子作為建材的大師一起搭蓋。

快速發展的城市,概無法接受認可在地知識,在中國成千上億,有著千百年累積在地智慧的手,自鄉村移動到城市後便被遺忘。如果能重新省視在地知識的價值將其植入都市場域,定能創造出屬於在地華人圈可持續性發展的綠新都。

中國建築師王澍是隻建築昆蟲,在新一代的城市建築工人間,他敏感地關注到在地知識的重要性,並將其內化為建築作品的精華元素。王澍在「完全控制」和「允許意外」的剃刀邊緣間小心取得平衡, 推動建築文化銜接滿足普羅百姓的需求。和謝英俊同個光景,就像電影導演柯波拉 (Francis Ford Coppola) 在《現代啟示錄》(Apocalypse Now) 所描寫道:「連爬帶滾 ,尚存一息」(Crawling, slithering and still surviving…)

阮慶岳要王澍、謝英俊和我一同合作,他覺得組成 「弱」(WEAK!) 建築團隊最好的方法就是邀請有志之士「弱」成一塊兒 (weak together)。王在台北城中藝術街區 UrbanCore Café 頂樓設計繭狀建築「亦方亦圓」,謝以廢墟建築學院為背景壤土如附生藤蔓蓋「後巷桃花源」。王像隻昆蟲,理解貫通立體三度空間的張力奧義, 作品沒用上一根釘子,僅取木條圈圍即成。謝則從建築學院的異質空間中爆開能量,在二、三樓的窗邊與後門於老舊公寓的後巷風景攀爬,如蘭在山中開,添得許多香。

兩人留白營造空間多於組織建構方盒, 作品皆能與當代都市人吟哦對話,和廢墟建築學院相同細緻地感受透視大地交匯的地平線。


即時台北 INSTANT TAIPEI


王澍的裝置作品「亦方亦圓」。


台北應小心面對走向更為「美化」更新的都市未來願景。若官方界定美麗的都市景觀意味著:極端控制自發自給自足的社區;剷除都市菜園和花園;禁止人民自力營造屋頂上的鴿籠與其他違章建築;禁止人民在水裡游泳;烤肉;遛狗;踐踏草皮;嚼檳榔;放風箏;擺攤;唱卡拉OK;禁止攀爬;採花;戶外野營;野餐…,請問還能做啥?美化後的都市剩餘價值的現況是河流依然飽受污染,依然髒臭 。


王澍和謝英俊的作品昭然若揭,構成即時台北的元素,是讓空氣能自由流動,空間能自如貫穿。視台北是一個整體空間,讓居民如蟻般不斷地建構解構有機編修。讓官方界定的台北和非法的「即時台北」都正視彼此的魅力之處。順應著大自然的律法,都市窳陋之處必也發酵成為新都市樣貌的沃土,請承認違章建築是台灣建築無法忽視的真勢力。

Preface
被所謂的「官方」冠上違法、破壞市容之名的違章建築,其實如同自然界的生衍,在台北這個「開放型態」的都市中萌發,展現居民自力造屋的天賦與權力,打破工業化所帶來的機械性,展現地方多樣性的思維,而仿違建而搭蓋的展覽裝置作品,也透過「非法」的表現來引發反思。

Information
▌譯者|Nikita Wu

▌註

「開放形態 」(Open Form) 的建築學是由挪威建築先行者 Team 10 成員之一的Oskar Hansen 所提出來,對早期現代主義建築「Close Form」的批判和修正,建築作品注重業主的參與及其個性需求的滿足與體現,而非建築師個人意願的主觀呈現。

Thursday, October 7, 2010

Ruin Academy


Ruin Academy (Taipei, Taiwán 2010 -) es una plataforma educativa independiente de arquitectura situada en el núcleo urbano de la zona de Taipei, Taiwán. La Academia se de desarrolla en cooperación entre el Laboratorio finlandes Casagrande y la taiwanesa fundación JUT para el Arte y la Arquitectura.


Ruin Academy se propone repensar la ciudad industrial y el encajonamiento del hombre moderno. Organiza talleres y cursos para diversas universidades taiwanesas e internacionales, incluyendo National Taiwan University Department of Sociology, Tamkang University Department of Architecture, Aalto University Sustainable Global Technologies Centre and Helsinki University of Arts and Design Department of Environmental Art.. Las tareas de investigación y diseño se mueven libremente entre la arquitectura, el diseño urbano, el arte ambiental y otras disciplinas del arte y la ciencia dentro del marco general del medio ambiente humano construido.


La Ruin Academy ocupa un edificio de apartamentos abandonados de 5 pisos en el centro de Taipei. Todas las paredes interiores del edificio y todas las ventanas han sido eliminadas con el fin de crezca el bambú y las hortalizas en el interior de la casa. Los profesores y alumnos duermen y trabajar en dormitorios ad-hoc hechos de caoba cuentan con una sauna pública en la 5 ª planta. Todo el edificio está perforado con agujeros de 6 pulgadas con el fin de permitir "la lluvia en el interior". La Academia es vista como un ejemplo o un fragmento de la Ciudad de tercera generación, la ruina orgánica de la ciudad industrial.


Sin sus ruinas el hombre es un mono común.


Ficha técnica
Arquitecto: Marco Casagrande
Gerente de Proyecto: Nikita Wu y Fundación JUT
Coordinadores: Lea Yi-Chen Lin, Hung Yi-Ling
Fotos AdDa
Contacto: info@ruinacademy.com

Saturday, August 14, 2010

Ruin Academy


The Ruin Academy is an experimental platform for knowledge building on the way towards the Third Generation City – the ruin of the industrial city. The Academy offers a public sphere for cross-disciplinary communication within the general field of built human environment, city. We don’t focus in the different disciplines of art and science. We focus on local knowledge, people and stories.


The Academy is more like a Pub than a University – or like a public sauna in Finland, where everybody is stripped naked from the President to the Police.


We must build a public sauna to the Ruin Academy.


The Ruin Academy sends an open call to think on the urban environment – the city, the people and the nature. We want to understand the ruining processes in Taipei. Ruin is when man-made has become part of nature. People are ruining the industrial city; this is connected with the local knowledge. Who are the professors of the Local Knowledge in Taipei? They should be the bar-tenders of the Ruin Academy.


The Ruin Academy is an independent and free platform where the different student groups and other players can meet. The Academy is about knowledge building. It is a simultaneous construction site and a ruin. We don’t know what we will find but the first step is to break the box, ruin the city. What comes to the academic control, we will give up in order to let nature step into our ruin. There is no other discipline than nature. There is our Pub.



LINK

Sunday, October 7, 2007

RUSSIA - the diesel engine of art

RUSSIA – the diesel engine of art
蘇俄-藝術中的柴由引擎


The question about the Russian architecture or Russian art is the same as the question of the Russian soul. The Russian soul is big, it is very wide, it is sort of old and it is definitely very close to heart. Judged by the modern media or the modern urban art the real Russian soul today has no value. Also for the Russians the soul is in mental crisis – it appears.

Russia has produced the biggest steps of contemporary theater after the Greeks. Russians invented the big movies. Russians build Kremlin and St. Petersburg just to laugh for the West - half drunk and in straight connection to the mysticism of the chanting of the monks and dieing of the land slaves. Russians stole all Hitler’s paintings. Dostoyevsky, Chekhov, Gogol – they were not Russians for joke and the biggest of them all: Tolstoy. All the ballets and symphonies Revolution in painting (Malevitch), revolution in architecture (Constructivism), revolution in cinema (Eisenstein), revolution in politics (Lenin).

And now: boring. Barbie –style glass architecture. Fake lesbians singing pop songs in English. Two Lenin –copy middle aged men posing to American 50 years old cheer leaders in a fancy air conditioned coffee shop.

Power Architecture

In Russia art has for long had a special meaning for the normal people. They feel that the art is for them and they are proud of their great culture. In the communist times the normal citizen could go for free to the finest museums of the world like the Hermitage in St. Petersburg. All the museums were for free, theatre was for free, cinema for free, circus for free and so on. Art was everywhere for the proletariat.

It did not matter weather you walked the boulevards of Moscow or St. Petersburg or on a muddy road of a collective farm Kolkhoz, one thing granted was public art. Dynamic sculptures of the Soviet Realism praising the heroes of the Great Patriotic War. Lenin rising to the skies even in the smallest of the villages. Also posters of high end graphic art all around the walls.

In Soviet Union the fine arts did not mean art for fine people, but as the Constructivists in the 1920’s proclaimed: we will drive a train of art to the places where art has never been seen before.

Of course the art as the Soviet Constructivists too served one cause – the revolution. In the beginning of the Bolshevik revolution Lenin realized how to use art in engaging and mesmerizing big publics. The Constructivists were perfect for his cause. They did not mind of the traditional disciplines of art but freely mixed architecture with sculpture, movie, theatre and all the other performance arts. They produced to him striking posters and agitative movies and as they promised, they constructed even trains to drive the Bolshevik art to the remotest of the villages. These trains were called Agitation Trains.

Soon the peasants and factory workers could see themselves as heroes of work in the graphics all around the empire and in the post stamps. They were farming even in the money. They were told that for them was build the amazing constructions of industrial or ultra modern urban architecture. Eisenstein made them almost religious icons in his movies like Battleship Potemkin or The Strike.

The Constructivists run wild till the end of 20’s but then Josef Stalin put his heavy hand on art and architecture and the tone became more serious. No longer did the art and architecture serve the cause of the proletariat but to underline and manifest the power of Stalin. A new era of Stalinism became.

When you visit any of the great cities of Russia you will meet the power architecture that of Stalinism. Brutal and dark color classic style concrete buildings or the so called Tooth of Stalin, the obligatory skyscraper as straight from Fritz Lang’s movie Metropolis rising above city as if guarding it like a watch dog.

Every state office was a Stalinist colossal monument and people felt very small to enter. To house the common people the Soviets developed the new style of social architecture called the Soviet Realism. Tens or hundreds of thousands of people were moved into the newly build concrete element satellite towns around Moscow or any big city. These buildings still exists and you will meet them when you visit Moscow or St. Petersburg. But they are not alone. There was a long time of Russian history before the Bolsheviks and now some 15 years of the modern era of the post-communist Russia.

The Cry of the Architects

The time before the communism is easy for the Russians to handle. This is the classic period that produced the great literature of the 19th hundreds, the ballets and so on. The was build the two great capitals of Russia too: Moscow from the Middle Ages onwards and St. Petersburg in the 18th century. In these two cities the Russians can feel their soul articulated in the finest ways architecture can ever do.

Red Square and Kremlin is the heart of Moscow and Russia while basically all of St. Petersburg is more or less an outdoor museum in a good sense like Venice. The both cities are full of Czar time classic buildings and Byzantine churches along wide boulevards and ring roads. Parks are plenty and people use their cities in a very physical way enjoying their cities as their home. Both the Muscovites and the St. Petersburg people are extremely proud of their home cities, but the city of the pride is the old city - the new time after the collapse of the Soviet Union is more traumatic.

Go to Moscow and the bank buildings are already surrounding the Red Square – the holiest of the holiest. The big oil-giants flashing their neon names like Jukos or Lukoil facing the tomb of Vladimir Iljich Lenin – how far can you go? Is Russia dead?

No: still the Red Square rules. Maybe the most hard core urban space in the world. Nothing can touch it. The forever mushroom towers of the cathedrals carrying both the Orthodox Christian cross as well as the communist red star in a pure balance. As when the Christians had to deal with the pagans and the Shamanistic Russian peasants in the Middle Ages (see: Andrei
Tarkovsky: Andrei Rublyev) so had the communists to deal with the gold framed icons and the mysticism of the Byzantine. Vladimir Putin on top of Vladimir Lenin on top of Ivan the Terrible. They all breath the same air of Russia. Not the same air as in the air conditioned coffee shop.

St. Basil’s Cathedral of the Red Square was started in 1552 by two Russian architects on the commands of the Czar Ivan the Terrible to build up a monument celebrating the final victory over the barbaric Tartarts. Hallucinating colors on the twisting top of the towers and the fantastic red brick work – the building breathes - it is not a building anymore, it really exists. Ivan the Terrible liked the work too. He made the architects blind by boiling their eyes with a red hot dagger so that they could never make another cathedral like St. Basil’s again. Russians love the Cathedral – Ivan, he united the country, Jukos and Lukoil are just hanging around. You can still hear the scream of the architects on the Red Square. Then go to Mc Donald’s just around the corner.

While on the Red Square you can feel Ivan the Terrible in the Russian Dark Ages making his decisions to destroy the Tartars on the shopping streets of Moscow you just feel poor. Moscow is really one of the most expensive cities of the world and the most expensive what comes to the rents. St. Petersburg – very expensive too. The rich elite walking in high heels and mini skirts in -30 degrees cold having their champagne and caviar for breakfast. Nothing has changed since Tolstoy. The upper class and the peasants have always been way apart in Russia and it seems to be perfectly okay, as being part of the soul. Bolsheviks made a short gap for the rich to parade the boulevards but now the citizens are proud to announce: they are back. In Moscow more US dollar millionaires than in any other city of the world.

St. Petersburg is phenomenal. Build in the 18th century by Czar Peter the Great the city is called the Venice of the North. The original swamp delta of the river Neva was then controlled by elegant canals, countless bridges and whole city was build in neo classic style to open a gate to West. Moscow is in the middle of Russia, while St. Petersburg was created as a port city to the Baltic Sea.

Compared to Moscow’s 10 million hectic citizens the 5 million St. Petersburg people walk slower their wide boulevards and they have art museums comparable to the Louvers of Paris. For many of the Russian elite Moscow is the city to work and St. Petersburg the city to be.

The Barbie Byzantine

What comes to the architecture of the time after the collapse of the Soviet Union – nothing much to say. All the money and gold was taken over by the nowadays elite of the Russians - the Oligarchs, who control the banks, the oil and so on. Since the Proletarian State is no longer the host of the architects and artist they now please the new king and architecture and art has become decoration for the rich.

The both centers Moscow and St. Petersburg have become so expensive in their city centers that normal people have nothing to do in there. The old buildings are mainly remained untouched while the communist era buildings are being knocked down one by one to be replaced by the strangest constructions of glass and stainless steel. They are truly a fascinating mix of star ship utopias (Juri Gagarin – first man in space) and dream works of a Barbie castle with a tip of Byzantine twist.

You can see housing areas of the gypsy mafia (Perm and Yekaterinburg cities in the Ural are controlled by a gypsy mafia matriarch) where the separate and ultra security one family houses are literally looking as cream cakes. You can drive in a pastry shop of architecture guarded by Caucasian machine gun men. Anything seems to go and the Russians are a bit ashamed. After such an intimate previous relationship with the art the people ask, where did the artists and architects go?

Also the monetary elite does not believe in their new money architecture either. They live in the old classic stone houses with modern interiors only to escape as often as they can to the countryside and into an old wooden forest house – Dacha to live like the elite always has lived in Russia, breathing the clean country air and slaving the rest of the people. Dacha though is pretty much alike the houses of the peasants.

No matter of the architecture Moscow and St. Petersburg are very different cities in the different seasons of the year. In the winter the both cities are really cold, clean, silent and somehow very physical. People are ice-skating on the frozen rivers and make barbeque in the city parks when the spit literally freezes in the air. The smoke of the cars is hanging behind them almost white and everybody has a similar fur hat. Air is sort of a good to breath. The windows of the houses are frozen and the houses look very intimate. When somebody lights a candle in his window table the ice on the window will melt and you can see in and inside seems to be very warm. In summer it is hot and polluted and people scream aloud. Anybody who can will withdraw to the countryside. The buildings are grey and the windows are black. Autumn is time for crying and romantics and the Russians do cry a lot. On Spring time the hell breaks loose. The ice on the rivers cracks away, you pick up the frozen bodies from under the snow and the cities are born again.

Toplo - the Heat

The surface of Moscow is hard, but inside is pulsating still the big Russian soul. By the citizens Moscow is treated more as a soul than a city and they are proud to be part of if. This soul finds it hard to take shape in the new architecture. Also for other arts all kind of revolution seems to be far away and a new kick is wanted. Or a very old one.

In the late years the Russian artists and architects have stood aside from the more western dominated genres of the international contemporary art / architecture Biennales and Triennials. Also the curators have been shy to go Russia and not so much invited either. Much of this is inherited from the times of the Iron Curtain when world including the art world was divided in two and Moscow was the center of the other one.

Back then inside the East and Soviet Union was happening enough. In the 1980´s the small Taganka theatre of Moscow with Vladimir Visotsky as its star could shook the whole country and Soviet system by critical plays and ballads. Everybody in Russia knows the then forbidden songs handed hand to hand on C - cassets recorded on the plays. Architecture looked back to the Constructivism movement of the early revolutionary times and started to mix architecture with other disciplines of art - like poetry or punk -rock. Architects like Vilen Künnapu could be forbidden to construct anything, because the buildings were too powerful and challenging the Stalinist doctrine. None of this happens anymore and the Russians feel that the artists have left them watching the posters of money.

For the Russian contemporary art and the connection between the East and West the summer 2006 will be most interesting. The both capitals of Russia Moscow and St. Petersburg have come together to launch the biggest contemporary art event in the Russian history ever. The venue is called Toplo, roughly translated to something like Heat. The both cities are challenging 10 international and 10 Russian individuals or groups to intervene in the two cities by different disciplines and methods of contemporary art and architecture to gain a straight interface with the heat of the city or the soul. Sort of an attempt of urban acupuncture to bring the Chi of the city to meet the surface. Nothing like this has ever been seen in Russia and Toplo is also in the very focus of the international art world during the summer 06.

Grandmother

Toplo is supposed to answer and show what is the Russian contemporary architecture and art today and what is its position in the world. Before Toplo, to talk about the Russian soul or art it is better to leave the city.

Outside the city you can see something interesting, like something that can really to be described as Russian architecture. This is the small house. The same small wooden house from the East border of Finland to the Pacific ocean all the way across Siberia. In the Europe and West the small house would be build on a stone foundation – to make it permanent, so that the timber would not get wet and rotten. For the Russians, this stone foundation does not exist. For them the Eternity is not to build your house on the stone foundation but straight to the wet ground and let the lowest logs rotten for good. Then you change them or then the house tilts to some of the sides or what ever – this change, fatality and accident is more close to the Russian Eternity than a house that is build to stand straight. There is not one hut standing straight in the whole Russia and people live happily in them. They can be hundreds of years old - with Internet.

This housing is something between the nomads and urbanism. Like some sort of a transit area that later on has been found to be exiting. There is countless of similar kind of villages or collective farms / Kolkhozes around Russia with exactly the same house. The house lives in a very close connection to the nature and will get another coat of chopped fire wood on the Northern side during the winter. This house has no monetary value, the only value that exists is the humanistic value – it is my grandmother’s house.

Babushka, the grandmother is bigger in Russia than anywhere in the world. In general the man population drinks themselves to death by the age 53, so no grandfathers around. The grandmothers will stay in their native villages while young men move to cities. The cities turn out to be violent, aggressive and stupid like the young men. The villages are soft and run by the grandmothers. They preserve the old values including the architecture. On the fields you will see many women and an occasional sober man. When you enter a Russian city you will feel unsecured. When you enter a Russian village you will feel very humane and welcome.

Russia is a country of great contrasts – between the cities and the countryside, between the modern times and the eternal Russian ways, between the people and the elite. Everyone in Russia believes in the common Russian soul though and that it is generated by the common Russian people. To get a good picture of the power of the Russian art and architecture see Andrei Tarkovsky’s movie Stalker from 1978.

It is said that the Russian soul is slow to wake up but when woken it is unbeatable. For the same reason the Russian army is compared to a diesel engine – no fancy tricks, slow to warm up but then again runs forever. I have a feeling that the great Russian soul of art has been sleeping now for quite a while and is possibly about to wake up. This diesel engine has caused revolutions before. It is interesting to see what the Toplo Contemporary Art can produce. What is cooking inside Russia now? They have been silent too long.

The pictures on this article are taken during a car trip from Finland to Japan across Siberia in summer 2002 and on a motorcycle trip from Finland to China across Kazakhstan in Autumn 2004.

BOX

Miss Nikita Wu from Taiwan will participate in the Toplo 2006 Contemporary Art in Moscow and St. Petersburg as an invited artist. She will join an international task force C-Laboratory (www.clab.fi) to create a work Urban Acupuncture for the both cities. The work will move between architecture, urban planning, installation art and performance art. Miss Wu will also be the editor in chief of a free newspaper “Covjek” to be produced for the Toplo exhibitions in the both cities.

Published in Taiwan Performance Arts -magazine, 2005

Future Pavillion

Prof. Casagrande and Miss Nikita Wu, curator of the Future Pavillion.

The Art of Taiwan in Psychosis
- Japanese Ghost in the Future Pavilion

The central government of Taiwan arranged the Taiwan Design Expo 2005 in the Southern city of Kaoshioung in October 2005. My duty was to deal with the future and set up a so called Future Pavilion. In stead of futuristic kitchen interiors and color trends I ended up in the shadows of a Japanese Army laundry building, which I occupied together with the invited artists and architects. After examining and studying the Taiwanese art and architecture scene for a year I had come to a conclusion, that the island state is in psychosis and that its art is more or less therapy or just simply lies. The Future Pavilion became after a psychoanalysis a dark colored collection of Western and Chinese medicine in the form of architecture and other disciplines of art

The laundry building had stood abandoned the most of the time after the Japanese Army withdraw from Taiwan in the end of the Second World War. The Taiwanese army had used the building for a while but the abandoned it due to strong rumors of Ghosts. The Ghosts are very true in Taiwan and the Japanese Ghost must be one of the most traumatic ones
The building itself was beautiful – hand made of bricks and then plastered. The four 35 meters long wings meet each other in the center of the cross shaped plan in which also stands a tower in the focus of which is a deep well for fresh water. The whole building is realized for the scale of a man plus horse. One has been able to ride along the central corridors of the wings. Also the windows are on the height of a horse rider.

The building was cleaned of all sorts of military trash and the original door openings were again blown open in the central corridors of the wings. Planks were removed from the windows and additional entries were constructed into the middle section of each wing in order to create a circular walking path for the visitors to move from one wing to another. The cleaned up ruin was then given for the invited participants to work within the general themes of the wings. The pavilion was looking at the future and the present situation of Taiwan from four different viewpoints: Urban Acupuncture, Urban Nomad, Organic Layer and Ocean.

Urban Nomad

There is a strong contradiction in the Taiwanese cities between the official and the human layer of the cities. The official city is a polluting machinery of dead temporary buildings and super heavy American-Japanese traffic arrangements. Here and there rises sky scraper or public buildings that try to deal with the Taiwanese cultural traumatism generated by lack of identity by means of copying important buildings abroad or by inviting famous Western architect to borrow their name. Taiwan is in fact part of China, but also some sort of a bastard made with the Americans. The father complex of this corrupted child in between two homes is heavy and as a neighborhood bully he tries to dominate the close quarters with money and ignorance. This can be seen in the ecologically destructive urbanism, the industrial abuse of cheap labor and how the Taiwanese heavy industry is moving to pollute in the surrounding poorer countries.

The official city of the maps is nothing but a attaching platform for the diverse, small scale and hectic private enterprising. These vendors and food makers are nomads. The trolleys and food stands move on wheels, all imaginable merchandise in suitcases and bags and the whole system is constructed around hidden orders and agreements. The official police is looking at the other way. A street that can be daytime a boring sewage of endless cars and scooters may when the sun falls down become a vivid night market. The nomads roll together, the cars can no longer move and people find to the place. When you ask the people they only talk about this human city. The official city means nothing.

The Urban Nomad –wing of the Future Pavilion wanted to lift this city of people into the status of the official city and to present it as a possible structure towards the future. Masters course students form the Taiwan’s leading architecture school the Tamkang University had build up personal movable shelters of recycled materials to meet the urban conditions. “The Urban Nomad is an insect, who day by day goes through the metamorphosis from a larva to a butterfly. For the nomad a shelter is not a simple function, as a city flat, but for example movement can be both protection and basic condition of his business, a survival strategy. The nomad reacts for his surroundings physically and so being is very much part of it – and so he takes care of his surroundings. Without these nomads the Taiwanese cities would drown in their own filth. “ Wei-Chen Weng, one of the students.

Photographer Yeh Wei-Li’s five photo series ”Emperor Go Moves to City” confused the people. The painting of Emperor Go is a standard issue in every Taiwanese garrison and this historical character is also canonized to be a God. The Emperor wanted to win back his lost empire as the Kuomingtang party officially wanted to win back the Mainland China after being kicked out to the island of Taiwan by the communist army in the end of the 40’s. The photographer had found the portrait of Emperor Go amongst the garbage in the Future pavilion before its cleaning and then moved the painting into his city flat in the capital city Taipei and had documented the whole process. Witnessing the great Emperor and God Go in his status of trash and then bunking in the suburbs of Taipei did not charm everybody.

My own work for the Urban Nomad was video and photo documentation of the architectonic installation Land(e) scape (Finland, 1999) where we raised three abandoned barn houses on 10 meters high wooden legs to start walking after their farmers towards the cities of the south and in the end burned the whole installation together with a contemporary dancer and choreographer Reijo Kela.

Estonian architect and painter August Kunnapu painted a five meters high wall painting “Lemurian” to the front faade of the wing in which an extra terrestrial looking bold head is saluting the visitors with a frog hand. To the other end of the axis he had painted a big baby cat and a gymnast for 1930’s. Families took photos of themselves with the cat, the gymnast was maybe a bit odd and the Lemurian was obviously a bit scary.

Andrei Tarkovski’s movie “Stalker” was also shown as well as a rehabilitation plan that I realized for an illegal settlement “Treasure Hill” in Taipei 2003. Treasure Hill is a quiet community of old Kuomingtang –veterans and their families continuing an old Chinese village style living in an enclave in the middle of the city. The people were officially to be moved away but later on were allowed to stay and continue their lives as an urban laboratory for a sustainable way of living in Taipei.
Into the middle of the wing we constructed “The Chamber of the Post Urbanist” – steel furniture for post urban meditation. Heavy metal objects as sofa, table, bed, water reservoir, fire place and toilet. The walls were wall papered by Nikita Wu’s free newspaper for the Future Pavilion, the “Pe Po”. Close by was photos of Casagrande & Rintala’s work “Obihiro Walking Street” where the children of urban planners of a Japanese were asked to instruct their mothers and fathers to construct a good house out of cardboard and then paint it. In the end the children got into the houses and walked inside them to the city stopping every now and then to have a rest and to form a spontaneous, instant village.

Urban Acupuncture

The traditional Chinese medicine is based on observing, cultivating and reacting on the human body’s inner energy flows (Chi). The Chinese believe in the possibilities of this energy to be in connection with a greater cosmic energy. In the Urban Acupuncture –wing human build environment is treated as the human body by means of acupuncture.

Chi Ti-Nan, a Taiwanese architect and urban planner, is practicing the acupuncture in the light of his personal working method Micro-Urbanism, which is looking at the vulnerable and insignificant side of contemporary cities around the world. He believes that these forgotten and often abandoned areas of everyday life under urban design and capital driven development are, in fact, holding the genuine quality of each city.

For the pavilion Chi did five plans for the host city Kaoshioung but his part of the exhibition was considered politically so challenging that the organizer Taiwan Design Center tried to ban parts of his graphics in several occasions. Political corruption amongst the Taiwanese architects is the most stopping factor for a healthy development of national architectural identity and also Chi took it for granted that his graphics had to go. This did not happen and his frightening texts such as: “Take the whale back to the sea” remained.

Estonian Vilen Kunnapu, an old school constructivist and leading Estonian architect all the way from the 70’s has during the last couple of years concentrated on energy central architecture inspired by the Tibetian Mandalas, Palladio and Luis Khan. To the surroundings of the Future Pavilion Mr. Kunnapu constructed two three meters high red Stupa –buildings out of plywood. “These structures are important for the environment. The exhibition building itself is already very healthy.” According to Kunnapu the Stupas were both 1:1 scale energy center structures in the exhibition as well as models for bigger Mandala –temples to be realized in the Kaoshioung harbor and outside the city hall. Some visitors stopped in front of the Stupas to pray. Inside the pavilion architect Kunnapu exhibited his design line including the Buddhist Center of Tallin, Mandala –temple for Tallin Prison and 9 Mandala Temples for river Thames in London.

Both Chi and Kunnapu are processing a ritual through their architecture. If architecture in general is a theology, both Chi and Kunnapu are mystics. Both men could have been operating a thousand years ago. I also exhibited my study of urban acupuncture together with Alaskan industrial artist Martin Ross and Tamkang University students realized a year ago as part of the Taipei on the Move –project. In our work “Trojan Rocking Horse” we constructed 8 adult size steel made movable rocking horses and placed then to strategic points around Taipei city and started to move towards the center and eventually to surround the city hall. During the march the horses acted as mail boxes for the citizens to write comments, memories and suggestions to Mayor Ma Ying-Jeou as bases for urban planning following Fritz Lang’s maxim from the movie “Metropolis”: “The mediator between the head and the hands must be the heart.”

Organic Layer

Generally speaking the contemporary Taiwanese theatre is quite therapy polluted acting of acting -on the contrary to the Taiwanese puppet theatre and Chinese opera which have strong roots in the Mainland and Chinese culture. From the illusions of pornography and other light weight scream-cry is exfiltrating also honest performers. Kao Jyn-Hong has walked around Taiwan with vegetation in his back bag. Kao goes to the forest, digs of a tree, places it into his aquarium like back bag an starts walking and running.

The silent, archaic stalker, is not necessarily the most commercially successful Taiwanese artist nor celebrated in the flashy local design magazines but still again a clear choice for the Organic Layer –wing together with the Japanese pioneer of sustainable architecture professor Yoshio Kato. On the other end of the wing were Kao’s back bags growing trees and on the other end Kato’s models of micro climate architecture in Taiwan and Japan. In his video Kao is running on a highway with a tree in his back or silently looking dressed as a monk with the tree in his robe, Kato is explaining scientifically the climate conditions as the basis of architecture.

Yoshio Kato’s houses are almost laboratories, where the prevailing weather conditions are examined to the very details and no artificial air conditioning or other energy consumption is allowed. Professor Kato is a walking laboratory himself, pockets and car full of sensors ready to document the weather conditions when ever, where ever.

My own place in the Organic Layer –wing was in between Kato sensei’s wind catchers and Kao’s forest bags exhibiting an urban plan for Kaoshioung changing all the flat roof space into biomass production with needed additional constructions. I also planted 9 tin made copies of a hand of a Taiwanese farmer on top soil in one of the water pools of the wing.
Together with multimedia artist Nikita Wu we produced an experimental documentary film Zero City for the exhibition following the developing of a future housing area in the North of Taipei. When Hong Kong was about to go to the Chinese authority in 1997 the town of Danshui estimated some 300.000 immigrants to move to Danshui escaping the communist rule. They developed this area with urban infrastructure including roads, traffic lights and road signs such as “School”, “Hospital”, “Be Aware of Children” and so on for the people to move in with a slogan: “Hey guys, immigrate to Danshui!” The Hong Kong people never came and the area has stood empty ever since. Step by step the nature has overtaken the sites of the planned houses and the roads are used mainly by ants. The traffic lights are still working.

Ocean

The economical and political situation in Taiwan is in the point where there is enough money to start cleaning the environment of pollution but not yet political will for it. The heavy industry has already moved mostly to China, Vietnam and the Philippines and silently in the cities have start talking about cleaning the rivers, the polluted land and the heavily polluted ocean shore line.

The Ocean –wing exhibited works to encourage the Taiwanese visitors to start thinking seriously about the possibilities of ecological rehabilitation focused on the waters. Half of the wing was given to the Denmark based task force CREW*31 and its work “Post Industrial Fleet”. CREW*31 is specialized in converting big scale industrial ships and barges into new urban functions such as the Bioship as an in vessel treatment factory to separate, recycle and compost waste produced its host city. The Community ship gives free space for hobbies or community activities trying to activate the waterline as the new democratic surface of the cities. These ships are out of their industrial duty, the engines are removed and the ship more or less locked into a fixed position as part of the city.

The work was originally created for Denmark and then exhibited in the Venice Biennale 2004 but quite easily converted to meet the conditions in Taiwan as well. Both Denmark and Taiwan have one of the biggest commercial fleets of the world but the harbor industry is concentrating into a few huge scale harbors leaving the smaller harbor cities and towns without boats fading them away from their naval narrative. On the other hand the cities have now the possibility to move to the harbors and CREW*31 is giving them tools to activate the new urban space in a more humanistic and ecologically aware way as an example for a possible direction of new urban development.

Close to the thinking of CREW*31 is Casagrande & Rintala’s ”60 Minute Man” for Venice Biennale 2000 in which we planted a small oak forest into an abandoned industrial barge on top of 60 minutes worth of human waste produced by the city of Venice. For the small village of Rosendahl in Norway we constructed a floating sauna as the center point of the village spreading around the final bay of the Hardanger fjord. The sauna has transparent walls and open floor to the ocean. One can jump from the heat straight to the sea.

Japanese contemporary / experimental theatre director Daizo stirred the scene in Taiwan in March by his version of Faust -the Taiwan Faust hitting down to the Taiwan-Japanese traumas as well as trying to reeducate the Taiwanese actors and other theatre professionals. One of the main characters of the hectic play is a universal women goddess sailing around with her little boat. The Venus like character is both Holy Mary as well as the Taiwanese national saint Matsu. In the Ocean –wing one could see the partly eye and partly vagina shaped vessel of the goddess and a photo documentation of the actress transforming into the role of Matsu / Holy Mary as well as smoking cigarettes on the breaks. Also Sergei Eisenstein’s movie “Battleship Potemkin” was part of the display.

Fourth class students of the Tamkang University had constructed for themselves personal boats out of recycled material and then sailed with them in the Love river of Kaoshioung. The photos show the students throwing up in the middle of their colorful boats after drinking the polluted river water.

Generator

Japanese installation artist Sakura Iso washed the dirty laundry of the Japanese Ghost in the dark middle tower. The work called “Generator” was a complex mix of electronic sensors, microphones and oscillators mounted to the tower itself, into the deep well and the to the overtaking vegetation. Small laud speakers were then hidden into the structures, roots and leaves to create a gentle soundscape to work together with the ever altering natural light conditions of the tower and the shadows cast by the surrounding trees. Even the loud Taiwanese entered the space in silence and Miss Iso was believed to be able to communicate with the Ghost.

Essential part of the exhibition was the free newspaper edited by Miss Nikita Wu. She used the media of a newspaper instead of a catalogue to put together the thinking of the participating exhibitors in a direct way avoiding the common clichŽs of an exhibition catalogue. Most likely after the closure of the Taiwan Design Expo the Future Pavilion will be demolished to give way to maybe a Karaoke hotel. It seems thought that the exhibition and the newspaper have had enough time to raise conversation in Taiwan about the future and especially the role of an artist and architect as the ones to look towards the horizon. Of course some of the visitors were disappointed finding themselves in a dark ruin instead of being surrounded by future electronics. Most of the visitors though walked slowly in the wings with a silent smile on their lips. The leading Sufi researcher of Finland professor Jaakko HŠmeen-Anttila could have commented: “One has to take the liberty to take one self one thousand years back to realize, that the real things are the same.”

PARTICIPANTS AND WORKS

Each of the four wings carried one theme to look for future: Urban Nomad, Ocean, Urban Acupuncture and Organic Layer. The central tower was received for a Japanese installation artist Sakura Iso. In the wings the participants were free to use the smaller rooms and the central corridor. The graphic prints were laminated on acrylic and placed into the window openings.

URBAN NOMAD

August Künnapu, painter – architect, Estonia “Lemurian”, 2005 3 x 5 meters wall painting, acrylic on plaster. Painted on the main entrance of the Future Pavilion greeting the visitors.

Chang Shao-Hsien, Chou Yun-Jain, Liang Temg, Lin Chun-Yu, Weng Wei-Chen
Tamkang University Department of Architecture, Masters Course 1, Taiwan “Urban Nomad” , 2005.
1:1 scale models and photo documentation of personal one man urban nomad constructions and documentation of the structures in urban situations in the Kaoshioung City and County.

Casagrande & Rintala, architects, Finland.
“Land(e)scape”, 1999
Photos and video. Documentation of an architectonic installation with three abandoned barn houses mounted on
10 meters high legs for walking position and later on burned during a performance.

C-Laboratory, architects, Finland – Taiwan
“Chamber of a Post Urbanist 104”, 2005
Steel furniture for Post Urban Rehabilitation. Cave man style realizations of a sofa, table, bed, fire place, water
reservoir and toilet / composting unit. Wallpapers of the C-LAB newspaper “Pe Po”.

Hsu Chun Cheng, architecture student, Shy Chien Univeristy, Taiwan
“Urban Camper” , 2005
Posters and model. Movable dignity unit for post urban man including: Herhof portable biological
mechanical anaerobic composting unit, gas conditioning unit and bio-gas based electricity converter, bird
garden and collecting unit of birds digested sludge, rain water collecting and bio-filtering unit, 1100 cc bio
gas powered engine, earth worm farm, lockable parking stand / gate.

Casagrande & Rintala, architects, Finland
“Obihiro Walking Street”, 2002
Photo documentation of children architecture workshop in Obihiro, Hokkaido, Japan.

Andrei Tarkovsky, director, Russia
“Stalker”, 1978.
Movie

C-Laboratory, architects, Finland – Taiwan
“Organic Layer_Taipei” , 2003.
Photo documentation of an ecological rebuilding process of Treasure Hill –settlement in Taipei, Taiwan,

Yeh Wei-Li, photographer, Taiwan
“Emperor Go in the City”
Photos on light boxes. Narrative story of moving a painting form the Future Pavilion to Taipei. 2005

ORGANIC LAYER

Kao Jyn-hong, performance artist, Taiwan
“Re-Circulation of a Plant”, 2005 Installation, photo and video. Documentation of walking around Taiwan with vegetation in a glass aquarium back-pack. Vegetable gardens in human clothing. Aquarium back pack with vegetation.

C-Laboratory, architects, Finland – Taiwan “Touch down”, 2005 Installation. Nine tin made 1 : 1 scale casts of a hand of a Taiwanese farmer mounted on top soil.

Yoshio Kato, architect, Japan “Micro Climate Architecture”, 2005 Installation, models, photos and graphics of micro-climate based ecological architecture solutions in Japan and Taiwan.

Nikita Wu – Marco Casagrande, Taiwan – Finland “Zero City”, 2005 Experimental Documentary Film, 11 min. Documentation of a future 300.000 residents housing area in Danshui, Taiwan in a non build condition overtaken by nature but with ready made urban infrastructure waiting for the houses.

C-Laboratory
“Kaoshioung Roof Paddies”, 2005
Graphics of and urban plan for Kaohsioung City changing the roof scape into vegetable fields.

OCEAN

August Künnapu, painter – architect, Estonia
“Cat and Gymnast”, 2005
7 x 5 meters wall painting, acrylic on plaster.

Casagrande & Rintala, architects, Finland
“60 Minute Man”, 2000
Photos and video. Documentation of the architectonic installation realized for Venice Biennale 2000. 24 oaks
planted in an abandoned industrial barge on top of 60 minutes worth of human waste produced by the city of
Venice.

Tong Shang-Ren, Wu Zi-Jian, Xie An-Bang, Xie Wan-Rong, Xu wen-jing, Zhang Wen-Rui
Tamkang University Department of Arhitecture, 4th Year Design Studio, Taiwan “Personal Vessel”, 2005
1 : 1 scale models and photo documentation. One man hand made boats and documentation of test sailing on Love River in Kaoshioung.

Casagrande & Rintala, architects, Finland ‘”Floating Sauna”, 2002 Photo documentation. A floating sauna designed for Rosendahl Village in Norway as the center piece of the community.

CREW*31, architects – artists – landscape architects, Denmark -Finland “Post Industrial Fleet”, 2005 Graphics and steel made models. Urban planning rehabilitation strategy of industrial ships out of duty converted into fixed position urban use. Including Bio Ship and Community Ship. Realized urban plans for harbor cities in Denmark and Taiwan.

Marco Casagrande, architect, Finland “Eternity Vessel”, 2005 Installation. An eye -shaped plywood boat originally designed for Daizo theatre piece “Taiwan Faust” converted and mounted vertically hanging in the air.

Sergei Eisenstein, director, Russia
“Battleship Potemkin”, 1924
Movie.

Daizo, director, Japan / Nikita Wu, actress, Taiwan / Marco Casagrande, architect, Finland
“Taiwan Faust”, 2005
Photo documentation of transformation of an actress into role.

URBAN ACUPUNCTURE

Chi Ti-Nan, architect, Taiwan
“Micro Urbanism”, 2005
Printed Chinese Characters, flyers, graffiti and wall paintings. Micro Urbanism strategies for Kaoshioung City.
Political agitation.

Marco Casagrande, architect, Finland & Martin Ross, industrial artist, Alaska Together with Tamkang University Department of Archtiecture Post Graduate Students:, Fu-Wei Wu, Chia-Huei Lin, You-Chen Luo, Hung-Ming Chen, Chun-Hung Lin, Jen-Hao Cheng, Shin-Chih Hsiao, Ci-Ai Hsiao
“Trojan Rocking Horse_Taipei”, 2004
Steel made rocking horses and video. Documentation of attacking the Taipei City with a small army of 8 steel
made Trojan Rocking Horses. The 8 horses displayed on outside perimeter.

Vilen Künnapu, architect, Estonia
“Energy Center Architecture”, 2005
Installation, graphics and photos. Two human size plywood Stupas mounted on grass outside the pavilion.
Documentation of an energy center architectural line.

CENTER

Sakura Iso, installation artist, Japan
“Generator”, 2005
Installation. Recording and transmitting devices placed on the central axis of the building.

CATALOGUE

Nikita Wu, editor, Taiwan
“Pe Po”, 2005
Free newspaper. 24 pages full color tabloid in Chinese. 5000 copies. Review of the Future Pavilion and
additional invited artists and writers.

Artist : Wei-Li Yeh
Project Title : Emperor Go in the City, 2005
Project Description :

Marco Casagrande, a Finnish architect currently serving as a visiting
professor in Taiwan, presented to me an essay entitled ÁuAt Home in the CityÁv
written by an English architect, Angela Nkya. I subsequently read the text
on the responsibility of urban architectural design and the crisis of
homelessness on a flight from Taipei to Japan. Marco then explained that he
wanted me to present a series of photographs that had a dialogue with this
text in the Urban Nomad wing of a project he is organizing and constructing
for the 2005 Kaoshiung International Design Expo located on the defunct Wae
Wu Ying Military Base in Kaoshiung City.

Upon my return, we flew to Kaoshiung. By the time I entered the Laundry
Building on the Wae Wu Ying Military Base, this building has been abandoned
and boarded up for a number of years. Probably due to its irregularity in
shape and lack of large open spaces, the Laundry Building was not chosen for
reuse for the previous arts and cultural events hosted by the Kaoshiung City
government. A cross-shaped building surrounded by overgrown bush and trees,
this building is a bazaar spectacle. At the center of this cross resides a
well, which channels water into four sixty meters halls for the task of
doing laundry for the entire military base. After wandering through various
dark hallways, we encountered Go Jian. Hung above a door leading to the
center of a hallway, roughly three meters high slightly slanted downwards in
a traditional hanging style, it is strange to think of Go Jian suspended in
the dark for many years. Aside from minor debris such as wood and occasional
tables and trash, this painting is the only object that is left in the
entire building structure after the renovation and preparation for the
exposition.

After mulling over these parameters set forth before me for a week, I
decided to transport the painting of Go Jian to Taipei, the city of my
current residence. The displacement of this painting into another city as
well as the transfer of this work from a public sphere of the military
laundry facility into a domestic private setting mirror the predicament of
the Urban Nomads put forth by Casagrande. The nomad takes his experiences
with him and is imprinted by them, and makes do and anew with what is
available at hand in another setting. Emperor Go in the City reconfigures
the finding of a lost Chinese tale with a western sociological and
architectural manifesto. The different contexts and locations that the Urban
Nomad encounters and the legacy of this folklore in contemporary times in
its continual mutation poses a hypothetical future for both the Urban Nomad
and Emperor Go, when soon after this design exposition ends, the entire
conglomerate of buildings on Wae Wu Ying will be torn down and the cycle of
reconstruction begins again.
[Wae Wu Ying Military Base will be the future site of Kaoshiung City Opera
House, construction is set to begin in the spring of 2006.]